Problem with the time axis
Public.icon
If there are other variables in the hypothesis, the proposition cannot be achieved just by leaving them alone.
However, if there is a problem with competency, it is a problem other than the time axis. In general, it may be a thought experiment of What will happen to the proposition if it continues as it is now?
I often ask this question myself. It's a great initial test for ideas. (It's dangerous for everyone to say yes in 2-3 years, and it's even more dangerous for things that won't be yes even in 10 years. pic.twitter.com/pEL6tT1WML As a way of thinking, will humanity still be doing it in 100 years? → 100% No, will humanity still be doing it in 50 years? → Majority No, will humanity still be doing it in 10 years? → Majority Yes. I always want to bet on this kind of concept.
https://gyazo.com/f900f78f3dc60f2044a76725e248fc70
The book Antifragile discusses balance, nature and artificiality, and the importance of protecting irreversible things with insurance. It also explains why the United States is preferable to Japan, and the reasons for betting on Prediction Markets. The book provides insight into how to create a reliable algorithmic stablecoin, regardless of whether it is Bitcoin or Ethereum. Additionally, it announces Stablesats and describes how this platform brings USD to the Lightning Network through Galoy. Other topics covered include futures trading, perpetual futures, derivatives, and common pitfalls for Web3 founders. There is also a focus on event derivatives, feedback on elections, and the power of prediction markets. Money On Chain, Lightning Labs, Cryptoeconomics Lab, and Dark Forest are just a few of the other subjects explored. The film "The Man Who Drew Van Gogh" is also mentioned, as well as tracing Bitcoin as a part of internet history. Other topics include Cash App's business, aiding the detection of fake accounts in social online services with SybilRank, newsletters recommended for catching up on crypto-related news, making blockchains more human-friendly, and tips for logical structure in English. These are all useful resources for learning about the field. Additionally, there is information on card cases, crowdsourcing, commons-based peer production, and the definition of crowdsourcing as "an online, distributed problem-solving and production model" as well as travel expenses for those looking to relocate to Dubai, the Deep Sleep Cocoon, and gamefi, which is based on the concept of account reselling. Finally, the Matsuzaka method is introduced, which is a method to reduce methodological uncertainty. This concept also appears in things like this. It doesn't mean much in chaos.
In a world where exponential growth is occurring, it is almost certain that most propositions will be true.
Problem with the time axis
There is no choice but to succeed, but that success is always good (similar to failure is success).
1 correct answer out of 100! The cost of trying 99 times is smaller compared to the benefit of one expected success.
Edison, for example, did that with all the elements of atoms and made a nice filament. If you put it into practical use, it's just amazing. You have no choice but to succeed.
In the end, "having a high consciousness" or "being a really high consciousness person" is just based on the result, so if you keep doing it until you get the result, doing it with a high consciousness will increase the probability of success.
Genius is a person who can accurately perform obvious things quickly while reducing labor costs due to compound interest over time and thereby increasing the quality and quantity of input, making it impossible to catch up in practice. Therefore, it's only a matter of time if you don't make a mistake at the start and in the market, and success is the only option. You have no choice but to succeed. "It's a story of the time axis." As long as it's in your field of view, it's just a matter of phase, depending on whether you have the intention or the motivation to aim for it. It's only a matter of phase when it's in the angle that you can take, because you can't choose options that are not in your field of view.
In the end, "having a high consciousness" or "being a really high consciousness person" is just based on the result, so if you keep doing it until you get the result, doing it with a high consciousness will increase the probability of success. It's just a matter of time axis.
If you keep doing your best, the success of your business is just a matter of probability theory.